The Right Emphasis?
Posted by Peter Holran
There is certainly a lot of attention being paid to the arrest in Travis County, Texas, involving the use of a TASER® device on a 72-year-old woman. It is dominating blogs, Twitter and websites all over the Internet — almost to the same level of ubiquity that the “naked wizard guy” video received after it went viral last month. Then, following yesterday’s release of the in-car video of the Travis County incident, it now has been covered by most traditional television, radio, and print media outlets across the country and throughout the world.
One of the most balanced reports I have seen thus far on the incident was on the NBC Today Show yesterday — including the after report discussion between Erin Burnett and Matt Lauer sharing their personal views on the situation.
While I can understand the sensational draw and the spirited debate over this incident, I am left wondering why only a select few TASER uses are covered this intensely by the media or on the Internet. It seems as if the TASER device only gets this kind of coverage when it is used in what is perceived to be a negative or controversial situation.
There are thousands of videos where officers used a TASER device according to their agencies’ policies and it directly led to the saving of an individual’s life. But we rarely see these instances covered on a national scale.
Electronic control devices are saving lives, reducing injuries and saving precious taxpayer dollars in workman’s compensation and litigation savings in the communities across the United States that are patrolled by the nearly 14,000 law enforcement agencies that carry TASER devices.
I personally believe a life saved deserves the same, if not more, coverage than a 72-year-old who became belligerent in refusing to sign a ticket or a naked guy at a music festival. This is certainly true with the story today from Amherst, N.Y., about the 6 month-old baby who was saved by an officer using a TASER device.